Ex-Air Corps members demand ‘truth’ after €2m chemicals case

Despite a promise of justice, Air Corps chemical exposure survivors say the Irish State continues to deny and delay accountability

A former member of the Defence Forces who says his health has been destroyed by exposure to dangerous chemicals during his service has called for the Government to “let the truth come out”.

The State agreed last week to pay €2m to Gary Coll, 51, to settle a legal case taken by him in relation to his claims, without accepting liability.

Mr Coll served as an aviation technician with the Irish Air Corps in Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel, between 1991 and 1997.

His case is the first of ten which have been taken by former members in relation to what they say was the failure by the State to protect them from exposure to dangerous chemicals.

Speaking on RTÉ’s Upfront with Katie Hannon, Mr Coll said the State is “hiding behind the State Claims Agency, hiding behind the Courts.”

“The minister stands up and says he can’t look at a health and safety issue because he has to wait for the go-ahead from the State Claims Agency, or the Courts? No. It’s a cop-out to hide behind the court cases,” he said.

Mr Coll says he now suffers from chronic fatigue, has issues with his heart, breathing, and memory, recurring ulcers, and is unable to maintain his core body temperature.

He says during his service there was exposure to chemicals during basic work tasks.

“There was fumes, chemicals being used openly with no extraction systems, within feet of where you worked,” Mr Coll said.

“The place was a mess, the floors were that dirty that people were afraid they would catch fire, there was that much oil and chemicals spilled on the floor of the hangers,” he said.

There was also a tradition of ‘tubbing’ in the Air Corps, whereby individuals would be dunked into tanks of chemicals for various purposes, including as part of initiations or hazing.

He said such tubbing happened to him several times.

https://x.com/RTEUpfront/status/1889094673647440041

Mr Coll joined the Air Corps as a teenager, and represented it in national and international rugby and rowing tournaments in the earlier years of his service.

He said he left his job in his mid-20s due to a slew of medical conditions he experienced while he was still serving, including headaches, vomiting, diarrhoea and nosebleeds.

He now requires the use of a mobility scooter or walking stick to get around.

“I suffered anxiety for years, about 2004 or 2005 I started developing neurological problems, pins and needles, tremors and shakes, it started effecting my balance, my memory’s gone, my short-term memory.”

“In a few months time, I’ll probably forget being here tonight,” Mr Coll said.

Two other former Air Corps members also spoke on the programme. Neither are currently taking legal cases, but both believe exposure to chemicals during their service has significantly damaged their health.

Paul Flynn, 52, spoke to presenter Katie Hannon by video call from his hospital bed. He has been in hospital for 15 months.

He joined the Air Corps in 1988 a week after his 16th birthday. From 1991 to 1998, when he left the service, he worked preparing aircraft parts for painting with primers, topcoats, and spraying.

He said in his early days working in the role there was no protective equipment “at all” provided. Several years later, he said he bought his own air-fed mask, but the line installed to feed it was placed beside a compressor in another room where chemicals were also present.

“I have issues with breathing, sometimes I’m on oxygen… I would like the Government to acknowledge that the chemicals have injured people,” Mr Flynn said, who accepts he cannot definitively link his health issues to chemical exposure.

“The Australian and Dutch government have admitted the same chemicals that we used caused the same injuries we have. I want the Irish Government to admit to that and provide us with whatever care they we need.”

Mr Flynn, aged 52, says his medical team is now advising he move to a nursing home.

https://x.com/RTEUpfront/status/1889090652786286649

Michael Byrne joined the Air Corps having served earlier in the army, he entered to train as a winchman, having passed a fitness selection course.

Unlike Mr Coll and Mr Flynn, he did not serve in the paint shop, but he says he was exposed to chemicals during refuelling of aircraft without PPE.

He said he was splashed with chemicals, and had to breathe in chemicals, as he was required to keep his face close to the refuelling point on the aircrafts.

“There was often – a common occurrence – you’d get an airlock, a backwash of fuel into the eyes, into the mouth, ingested it,” he said.

Within a year of joining the Air Corps after the army, Mr Byrne said, his health began to deteriorate, and he eventually left his job.

“I joined the Air Corps to hang out of helicopters. I joined it for the adventure. When I became sick and I wasn’t able to do the duties anymore – and because under aviation law because I was on high dose steroids, you’re not allowed to fly – I was given jobs like answering phones, I was cleaning toilets at times. So I left, disheartened, and I left.”

“I’ve had two knee replacements, I’m due two hip replacements, I currently have a fractured spine, I’m in a brace at the moment, from just doing menial tasks around the house.”

He said he can not definitively trace his health issues to chemical exposure, but says the timeline is significant.

“I was perfectly healthy, from that point – within a year – I went from running ten miles a day to not being able to run across the road when a car came.”

Mr Byrne is not taking a legal case because he is “just trying to get through day-to-day at the moment, just with pain and managing everything like that.

“I want answers, I’m going downhill, my elbows swell, my knees swell … It was proven in Australia, why can’t they use those templates? At home, most days I don’t move, I can’t get up” he said.

In Australia, in 2009 there was a parliamentary inquiry into similar issues which resulted in payments and healthcare services – including cancer screening – being provided to former Royal Australian Air Force members who were exposed to dangerous chemicals.

Several former Air Corps members who say they have been exposed are calling on the Government to take similar action. In particular, they are calling on Taoiseach Micheál Martin to act.

The Taoiseach and other ministers note that the handling of complaints raised about chemical exposed fall under a Tribunal of Inquiry which was set up after the so-called ‘Women of Honour’, which revealed concerns about bullying, misogyny and sexual assault within the Defence Forces.

In June 2017, Mr Coll and others met Mr Martin, then the leader of the opposition, to outline their concerns and issues related to chemical exposure.

Mr Martin subsequently told the Dáil that three whistleblowers had warned in November 2015 about conditions in the Air Corps maintenance units in Baldonnel, and the degree to which staff were “exposed to very dangerous solvents and chemicals.”

Mr Martin at the time called on the government of the day to commission an independent board of inquiry “into this entire affair and scandal,” summarising the then-government’s response as “deny, deny, deny, resist, resist, resist.”

“The linkage of the particular chemicals to cancer-causing diseases, genetic mutation, neurological conditions and chronic diseases have been well-established”, Mr Martin said at the time.

In a statement to Upfront from Katie Hannon, a spokesperson for Mr Martin said “throughout his time as Taoiseach, and as Minister for Defence, the health and safety of the men and women of the Defence Forces has been a priority.

“There are a number of other personal injury claims currently active before the courts, and it wouldn’t be appropriate to encroach on the independence of the legal process.

“The Defence Forces Tribunal of Inquiry was established in June 2024 and, as part of its terms of reference, will investigate the response to complaints made regarding the use of hazardous chemicals within Air Corps’ headquarters at Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel.”

The Department of Defence told Upfront with Katie Hannon: “The Health and Wellbeing of the men and women working in the Air Corps is a priority for the Tánaiste and Minister for Defence, as it is for the Defence Forces Management and the Department of Defence.

“The decision to take litigation is a matter for each individual, as is the decision to engage in dialogue to explore and potentially reach a settlement in relation to such matters. In respect of the recently reported case, the parties agreed to settle the matter before the commencement of the trial, on terms agreed by both sides, with the benefit of legal advice at every stage of the process.”

https://www.rte.ie/news/upfront/2025/0211/1495941-ex-air-corps-members-demand-truth-after-2m-chemicals-case

*****

Delay – Deny – Die

Air Corps chemical poisoning: Betrayal, legal battles, and a decade-long fight for justice

Despite a promise of justice, Air Corps chemical exposure survivors say the Irish State continues to deny and delay accountability

Meeting Micheál Martin on Tuesday, June 20, 2017 is a moment that is etched on Gary Coll’s brain.

As the then leader of the opposition, the now Taoiseach spent the best part of an hour with the former Air Corps aviation technician and five of his colleagues in Leinster House.

They had met him, at his invitation, to plead their case about the need for urgent State intervention into the issues around chemical poisoning in the air corps.

At the time, around 40 Air Corps personnel under the age of 65 were understood to died in the previous 27 years from suicide, cardiovascular events and cancer. Hundreds more were suffering a raft of chemical exposure-related illnesses.

They all mostly maintained aircraft without using PPE, and with little or no training or advice about the toxic chemicals they were either working with or in the vicinity of.

At the end of the meeting Mr Martin, who went on to become Taoiseach in June 2020, vowed to be an advocate to their cause.

Just before the meeting concluded, Gary limped over to him and asked if he would still support air corps chemical exposure survivors when he became Taoiseach.

Gary, who last Wednesday was awarded €2m in a settlement to his High Court claim for damages against the State, recalled:

“He looked me firmly in the eye, and — as he shook my hand — said he would because it was, in his words, ‘the right thing to do’.”

Gary bristles with anger as he recalls the moment.

Read full article by Neil Michael at  the Irish Examiner
https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/spotlight/arid-41570956.html

*****

Delay – Deny – Die

Over a decade on, ill Air Corps technicians still await a fair hearing

The settlement between the State and Gary Coll closes one chapter in the allegations by former Air Corps technicians that they were exposed to dangerous chemicals while working on military vehicles. However, as Joe Leogue outlines, many more cases and issues of disclosure remain unresolved

Ex-Air Corps member Gary Coll from Lifford, Co. Donegal. The State has agreed to pay €2 million to a former Air Corps technician who was allegedly exposed to toxic chemicals which he says caused severe health difficulties. Photo by Joe Dunne

A settlement on the steps of a court usually marks the conclusion of a dispute — however, the reported €2m pay-out to Defence Forces mechanic Gary Coll on Wednesday is but another development in a bitter dispute between the State and former Air Corps technicians that has raged on for over a decade.

Mr Coll settled his High Court action against the State having alleged he was exposed to various dangerous chemicals while he worked at Casement Aerodrome in Baldonnel, Dublin. The settlement was made without an admission of liability.

The State contended it provided a safe workplace at Casement, and did not allow inappropriate work practices there.

The settlement is a milestone in an ongoing saga that is complex, but at its core comes down to two simple, related, questions; did the State fail in its duty to protect scores of Defence Forces staff from the impact of harmful chemicals, and were there attempts to cover this up?

Mr Coll’s case was the first of 10 such legal actions to come to an end, with all 10 cases bearing similar complaints. The first legal claims were lodged with the High Court in 2013, and all litigants worked in repair and service workshops based in Casement Aerodrome.

All 10 say that they suffered chronic conditions including cancer and neurological problems as a direct result of their exposure to the chemicals with which they came into contact as part of their duties when servicing Air Corps aircraft.

In 2017, then in opposition, Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin was scathing of the report, accusing the government of knowingly appointing a reviewer who, by his own admission, was unable to meet the terms of reference of the investigation.

“It’s farcical. It seems to me there are no records of compliance with health regulations, which is very, very serious because in their absence one has to conclude that the probability is they were not complied with,” he said.

“The government needs to establish a forensic examination into this,” Mr Martin added.

“I don’t think it is acceptable to wait for court cases against the State to conclude as there is no guarantee these legal proceedings will establish what happened in the past.”

That line has proven particularly prescient eight years later. The settlement of Mr Coll’s case this week means that no evidence was heard. Nothing has yet established what has happened in the past.

This matters to the former Air Corps mechanics for many reasons. Chief among these is that since 2018 the government rejected opposition calls for a healthcare programme for these workers — similar to the Australian model — on the basis that the courts were the place to establish liability.

Read full article by Joe Leogue at  the Irish Examiner
https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/arid-41569999.html

*****

Delay – Deny – Die

Air Corps grounds aircraft after safety audit raises concerns over bolt tightening

It is understood an internal safety audit uncovered issues that rendered the planes unsuitable for flying until each aircraft had undergone extensive checks.

The Air Corps has grounded a number of planes over safety concerns about how the nuts and bolts holding them together are tightened, the Irish Examiner can reveal.

It is understood an internal safety audit uncovered issues that rendered the planes unsuitable for flying until each aircraft had undergone extensive checks.

The main concerns are understood to centre around the type of tools used to tighten the planes’ bolts, and the application of what is known as “proper torque”.

This is the specified tightening force needed to apply to an aircraft’s nuts and bolts and which has a force with a specific range prescribed in that particular aircraft’s maintenance manual.

If specially calibrated torque wrenches are not used to tighten nuts and bolts every time, this can lead to problems — including propellers falling off and internal engine damage.

The General Officer Commanding of the Air Corps Brigadier General Rory O’Connor is understood to have summoned all Air Corps engineers officers to meet him about the results of the audit.

The meeting, which was held at the Air Corps base at Baldonnel during the week, is understood to have led to a number of crews being “berated” over safety standards.

“Everyone in Baldonnel is talking about the audit, and the fact that some of the tools used on these very expensive aircraft were bought from a supermarket.” 

The Chief of Staff of the Defence Forces Lieutenant General Seán Clancy has been briefed on the issue and it is understood there is now an investigation underway about what happened and why.

Read the full article by Neil Michael at the Irish Examiner
https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41570743.html

*****

Delay – Deny – Die

State agrees €2m settlement in Air Corps chemical ‘tubbing’ case

Central to Gary Coll’s claims was that he underwent ‘tubbing’, a form of hazing where workers were submerged in a bath of unspecified chemicals and oil

The State has agreed to pay €2 million to a former Air Corps technician who was allegedly exposed to toxic chemicals which he says caused severe health difficulties.

The case against the Department of Defence is the first of 10 personal injuries cases due before the courts relating to the exposure of Air Corps members to dangerous chemicals and solvents used in aircraft maintenance.

Gary Coll (51), from Lifford, Co Donegal, joined the Air Corps in 1991, when he was 17, and worked in the avionics section until 1997.

In a statement of claim, he made a large number of allegations against his former employer including that he was not provided with a safe working environment at the Air Corps headquarters in Baldonnell, Co Dublin, and that there was inadequate supervision regarding the use of dangerous chemicals.

Central to Mr Coll’s claims was that he underwent “tubbing”, a form of hazing where workers were submerged in a bath of unspecified chemicals and oil.

Mr Coll, who was once an accomplished athlete, detailed several psychological and physical issues that he alleged were caused by the chemicals. He said he is unable to walk any significant distance without a cane.

Read full article by Conor Gallagher at the Irish Times
https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/courts/2025/02/05/state-agrees-2m-settlement-in-air-corps-chemical-tubbing-case/

*****

Delay – Deny – Die

Dear Councillor, Please don’t give any Seanad Election 2025 preference to Cathal Berry or Gerard Craughwell

Dear Councillor,

My name is Gavin Tobin and I am the spokesperson for the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors. We represent serving & former Irish Air Corps personnel injured by toxic workplace chemicals.

I am also one of the three whistle-blowers that revealed the ongoing workplace chemical Health & Safety tragedy at the Irish Air Corps bases in Baldonnel, Co. Dublin & formerly Gormanston, Co. Meath by making a Protected Disclosure to then Minister Simon Coveney in December 2015.

I believe myself and hundreds of my colleagues were injured by atrocious working conditions in the 1990s whilst working as apprentices, aircraft technicians and support personnel.

I worked in the exact location below  where I have recorded 14 untimely deaths just in this location out of 110 untimely deaths overall. That is Ardrox 666 which contained hexavalent chromium (the Erin Brockovich chemical) running down the walls from the extractor fan.  The smaller barrel dissolving itself contains Ardrox 1074 with hydrofluoric acid an exceptionally dangerous chemical, this chemical can dissolve glass.

When the Air Corps Pilatus aircraft were being equipped with smoke generators in late 2015, for the centenary flypast to commemorate the 1916 rising,  I was made aware of an accident due to chemical exposure where two technicians were injured and when I contacted the HSA to ask if this incident was reported a workplace accident I found it was not.  This lead me to realise that the working conditions that I believe made me & others sick in the 1990s still prevailed in 2015.

In parallel Sergeant Patrick Gorman who sat on the National Executive of PDFORRA wrote a letter, raising chemical Health & Safety concerns, to the Defence Forces about the lack of chemical Health & Safety at Baldonnel including the lack of risk assessments, lack of PPE and lack of risk specific health surveillance. The General Secretary of PDFORRA later revealed to me that this letter was never responded to.

Sgt Gorman was one of the whistle-blowers who reported this wrongdoing to Minister Simon Coveney in early 2016 and was constructively dismissed from the Air Corps as a result of doing the right thing.

We also learned that as early as 1995 the Irish Air Corps had independent air quality testing carried out at Baldonnel and found the levels of a toxic solvent in the building where I recorded 14 untimely deaths was 175 parts per million when the then legal limit was 50ppm. This air quality test failure was withheld from personnel who worked there and no actions were taken to reduce or remove the exposure.

In 1995/1997 further testing was carried out by state body Forbairt which again found chemical hazard issues and recommended that all personnel be issued with PPE and be given chemical handling training. This was not actioned until 20 years later after the three whistle-blowers reported the Air Corps to the Health & Safety Authority who threatened legal action against the Air Corps unless they heeded their demands.

You can read about Air Corps / HSA interactions here

We also learned that the State Claims Agency had been auditing the Defence Forces Heath & Safety from 2006 to 2016 and were giving them awards for excellence in Health & Safety and using this success to  award themselves performance related gratuities for so called “improvements” in risk profile. These pre-arranged audits “by appointment” are simply not credible.

*****

Cathal Berry

In early 2020 former Commandant Cathal Berry threw his hat in the ring  for a Dáil seat in the Kildare South constituency.  Cathal Berry is a medical doctor and we thought & hoped he would be keen to help us work to reduce suffering & untimely deaths amongst exposed Irish Air Corps colleagues…how wrong we were.

I did personally offer to canvas for Cathal Berry and indeed some Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors did actually canvas for him. There was some hope amongst serving and former Defence Forces personnel that Cathal Berry would give a voice to those harmed by multiple scandals in the Defence Forces including the Air Corps toxic chemical exposure scandal, the Lariam scandal and later the Women of Honour Scandal but there are more.

Alas Cathal Berry had zero interest in anyone wronged by the Defence Forces. He appeared to be there to represent the interests of the Defence Forces management and spent more of his time in the Dáil pushing for more equipment & weapons.

Cathal Berry also voted with the Fianna Fail / Fine Gael / Green government the vast majority of the time.  A vote for Cathal Berry is certainly NOT an independent vote. 

We would all like to see a better equipped & funded Defence Forces but this cannot be at the cost of trampling on those who were harmed during their service and Cathal Berry showed absolutely zero interest in helping those wronged.

We formally asked Cathal Berry for help on on the 10th of January 2021 and this letter can be read here. Cathal Berry NEVER responded to this letter. 

A further 22 fresh deaths have occurred since we first sought help from Cathal Berry, some of these people could have been saved. 

*****

Senator Gerard Craughwell

In April 2017 I made a protect a protected disclosure to a number of politicians in the Oireachtas including the then Taoiseach Enda Kenny, as well as a number of TDs & Senators including Senator Gerard Craughwell.

In my disclosure complained that there had been injury to serving & former personnel and their families with suspected 20 untimely deaths.

        • I complained that the DoD had appointed someone with no medical background or toxicological background to investigate the whistle-blowers protected disclosure to Minister Coveney.
        • I complained that the State Claims Agency was abusing its position by appealing my High Court discovery decision and I suggested that a better use of these resources would be to conduct a scientific inquiry as had been conducted after a similar health & Safety scandal in the Royal Australian Air Force over two decades ago.
        • I suggested that the state should intervene medically & with a scientific  enquiry like in the RAAF scandal.
        • I complained about the Air Corps misleading the WRC and I asked for help saving lives and reducing suffering.
        • I complained about the attempted shredding of Heath & Safety documentations including adverse air quality test reports.

Senator Gerard Craughwell who served in both the Irish Army and the British Army, never responded to the protected disclosure. 

In later years I passed Senator Gerard Craughwell a list of  untimely deaths which had then grown to 70+ and he again failed to respond to me.

Later on social media Senator Gerard Craughwell when seeking medical interventions to prevent unnecessary suffering of injured colleagues he attempted to paint me as selfishly attempting to speed up my own court case.

You can see our list of demands here

Since we asked Senator Gerard Craughwell for help in 2017 a further 39 personnel have suffered untimely deaths. Some of these personnel could have been saved but Senator Gerard Craughwell  chose to look the other way and not support us. Shame on him.

Senator Gerard Craughwell was the second highest independent senator to vote with the last Fine Gael / Fianna Fail / Green government. A vote for Gerard Craughwell is certainly NOT an independent vote. 

*****

Cathal Berry and Gerard Craughwell could have simultaneously looked for more resources for the Defence Forces on one hand and on the other hand sought medical interventions & other supports for Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors, Lariam Survivors & the Women of Honour but they both chose not to and in multiple instances actually downplayed our lived experiences.

Early in 2024 the Women of Honour were joined by the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors & the Defence Forces Justice Alliance to give a briefing to members of the Oireachtas prior to the vote to establish the Defence Forces Tribunal neither Dr Cathal Berry or Gerard Craughwell bothered to attend nor show any other support.

If these two men are elected to the Oireachtas we believe they will continue to have more loyalty to Lockheed Martin than to wronged serving & former Irish Defence Forces colleagues and this is morally wrong.

Full disclosure: I do have a personal injuries legal case pending against the state since 2013 for injuries I believe suffered during my service. I have been to the High Court 2016, Court of Appeal 2018, Supreme Court 2019 and the High Court again in 2023 to force compliance with the Supreme Court order of 2019 and all this just for discovery!

This decades long legal action should not in any way exclude me from the democratic process but I have been ghosted by Taoiseach Simon Harris, Tánaiste & Minister for Defence Micheál Martin and previously Leo Varadkar. Even President Michael D Higgins is currently refusing to meet with me or indeed any other #IrishAirCorps survivors.

Please do not vote for either Cathal Berry or Gerard Craughwell and give your independent vote for a true independent candidate not government supporting pretend independents.

Thank You.

Failed general election Independents Cathal Barry and Matt Shanahan to run for Seanad

Seanad office receives 70 nominations in advance of Wednesday deadline for candidates backed by professional bodies

Former Independent TD Cathal Berry who lost his South Kildare Seat in the general election is to run in the Seanad election as is former Waterford Independent TD Matt Shanahan, both of them from the Regional Independent group in the last Dáil.

Mr Berry, a former Army Ranger and medical doctor who received nominations from Oireachtas members, said “national security is a priority around Europe at the moment … So you need people with a particular expertise to have a mature conversation about it. And that’s what the Seanad is all about.”

The Upper House is seen as a way for former TDs to remain in the Oireachtas to win back their Dáil seat in the following general election.

Read full article by Marie O’Halloran at the Irish Times 

https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2024/12/18/failed-general-election-independents-cathal-barry-and-matt-shanahan-to-run-for-seanad/https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41414152.html

*****

Delay – Deny – Die

A private message from an Irish Air Corps survivor to Cathal Berry & his insensitive, uncaring response two month later

20th June 2020

Good morning Cathal,

My name is Pat Reilly and I served in the Air Corps from August 1991 to October 2013. I now live in Queensland, Australia, having moved here in May 2014 from our home in Walsh Island, Offaly. I was an aircraft maintenance engineer for the first fourteen years in the Air Corps and later became a photographer. I think I may have worked with you at one stage as a photographer.

I am writing to you regarding the toxic chemical scandal that has been destroying lives of former and serving Air Corps personnel but has been continually pushed aside by the Irish Government with a myriad of excuses including now, Covid-19, which they say is stopping legal documents from being signed due to social distancing.

I hope you don’t mind me sharing my story with you as I feel isolated here in Australia other than communicating occasionally with other veterans who are affected and very occasionally with the legal team who are trying their best to cut through the barriers the government are putting up back in Ireland.

While I’m no longer a voter in Ireland I’m still a citizen and I’m wondering can you ask a few questions around the chemical subject in the Dail as it has gone very quite the last year or so. I understand that Covid and the election has taken up a lot of time in the Dail but its this exact situation that I fear will be used to hide the scandal further as it seems to already have somewhat.

I would love to know when Minister Convey is launching his investigation into the subject as he promised and how long it will take. Time is critical in this matter as more and more of us are getting sicker by the day. It’s heartbreaking seeing relatively young men (possibly women also) cut down in their prime. Not being able to work and support their families and suffering debilitating symptoms day after day.

I’ll be honest and tell you there are tears flowing down my face typing this.I moved here to get away from Ireland and the job I loved because I was being bullied by my superiors in the Air Corps for being sick but now I’m unemployed due to my illness and trying to live off my Defence Forces pension and income insurance which may dry up any month now.

I feel worthless and a waster as I always gave 100% in any work I’ve done despite my illness. The only thing that’s keeping me sane and going in some respects is my medicinal Cannabis Oil which I was prescribed here last year after approval by the Australian government.

I’ve even lost the support of my wife who cant take our situation anymore and I fear for our marriage which is my second marriage after my first one broke up partially due to my illness also.

It seems that as soon as I hit my 40’s my body can no longer fight off my symptoms. Without my medication I have severe tremors and shakes and uncontrollable anxiety due to my sympathetic nervous system being damaged by the chemicals. This system also affects things like my bowels and stomach. It’s not a good experience when one soils themselves at work in front of customers.

I also have neuropathy in my legs where I cant feel and I lose control of my legs causing my knees to buckle and me to loose balance. My immune system is also damaged to the point I react to any sort of chemical smell, foods, materials and many other triggers. I cant breath properly and choke often due to damage in my nasal cavities which of course interrupts my sleep. Finally, I have a huge amount of pre-cancerous cells sitting their waiting to ruin me further, my doctor said she’s never seen this in anybody under 75.

All this has really taken its toll and I’m at the point I feel like giving up and I will share with you I was on the end of a rope earlier this year but I managed to talk myself out of it as I don’t want to be another statistic to add to the 78 dead already from untimely deaths in Baldonnel.

I decided there and then I didn’t want the government to win, I want them to apologize for the years of calling me a bluffer, a malingerer, telling ,me it’s all in my head. I also think at this stage we need a support package. I can no longer work no matter how much I tell myself I’d be ok working and I can no longer legally drive due to my medication. It’s literally like Russian roulette. I could work for a week or a day and then I’m too sick and have to go home which is why my current ‘employer’ (Apple) put me on an insurance plan as I became too unreliable despite having citations from the CEO of Apple for interactions with customers who emailed him to praise my work.

I could now be a Sgt Major in the Air Corps or an officer or be retired on a Flt/Sgts pension but this illness put a stop to all that. Instead I’m scraping by on a few hundred dollars and I’m stuck renting as no bank will touch me now and it sounds strange but I can’t even afford to move home to Ireland as logistically it would cost too much even to just give up and go.

I could go on all day explaining my illness and situation its that complex. I try to keep up a happy appearance on social media as some of my family and my 86 year old mother don’t know my situation and I don’t want her to be worried in her last few years.

I hope you don’t mind me writing to you as I needed to get this off my chest to somebody other than my wife and somebody like yourself who’s served and is now in a position to ask why we are being forgotten. The ministers involved keep using litigation as an excuse not to address the scandal as several of us have cases against the Dept but these are being dragged on and on the past six years with delay, deny, die tactics which is apparently the norm.

Thanks for listening Cathal and Sláinte,

Pat Reilly.

Berry’s utterly insensitive response, Pat very obviously is not “keeping well”

Dr Cathal Berry TD’s utteerly insensitive & unsympathetic response two months later disingenuously describing the Air Corps scandal as a legacy issue even though the Air Corps were issued chemical contravention notices as recently as December 2023.

I hope you are keeping well. I am sorry for only getting back to you now.

I do understand that the Air Corps Chemical Abuse scandal is a legacy issue and needs to be addressed properly. 

I will certainly raise this soon with the Minister at an appropriate time.

This was the one and only communication Pat had from Cathal Berry and Oireachtas records show that Deputy Berry has NEVER raised this issue in the Dáil chamber.

Perhaps Deputy can put on the record the response from the Minister if he ever bothered to raise it outside the public record.

*****

Dr Berry this is NOT a legacy issue as you pretend and it most certainly is a live issue for those suffering needlessly and dying young.

But we know you don’t care, shame on you.

Read an article from Ken Foxe dated 21st May 2024 on TheStory.ie

 

Health and Safety Authority inspections of Air Corps base at Baldonnel uncovers litany of safety issues

What does ChatGPT AI think of Cathal Berry’s abandonment of Air Corps whistleblowers?

ChatGPT said when asked…

“Why has Cathal Berry turned his back on Irish Air Corps whistleblowers?”

Cathal Berry has faced criticism for his stance on Irish Air Corps whistleblowers, particularly regarding his response to their allegations of wrongdoing and poor treatment within the organization.

While Berry has historically been vocal about the need for whistleblower protection and accountability in the military, his handling of specific cases involving the Irish Air Corps has raised eyebrows.

The controversy centers on his position as a public representative and his past ties to the Defence Forces. Berry, a former Army officer, was initially seen as an ally to whistleblowers within the military, advocating for reforms to address systemic issues. However, in recent years, particularly in relation to whistleblower claims from the Irish Air Corps, Berry has been perceived as less supportive, or even dismissive, of the concerns raised by those involved.

Some of the criticism stems from Berry’s reluctance to fully endorse or take a stronger public stance on specific whistleblower cases, possibly due to his complex relationship with the Defence Forces, where loyalty and internal solidarity can be deeply ingrained. His critics argue that, by not robustly supporting the Air Corps whistleblowers, Berry has failed to live up to his earlier promises of championing transparency and reform.

Others suggest that Berry’s political pragmatism may be influencing his decisions. As a member of the Dáil (the Irish parliament), his position on sensitive military matters may be influenced by a desire to maintain relationships within the Defence Forces or to avoid further controversy on an issue that could alienate potential allies or voters who are connected to the military.

In summary, while Cathal Berry has historically supported whistleblowers in principle, his perceived lack of strong support for the Irish Air Corps whistleblowers has led to accusations that he has not followed through on those commitments, possibly due to political or professional considerations.

Defence Forces Tribunal – Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is a Tribunal of Inquiry?

A Tribunal of Inquiry is a body set up to inquire into matters that are of urgent public importance. It is purely a fact-finding and investigative body. At the end of its inquiry, a Tribunal sends a Report to the Oireachtas. The Report sets out the Tribunal’s findings and makes recommendations for the future.

2. When was the Defence Forces Tribunal established?

The Tribunal of Inquiry into Issues Relating to the Complaints Processes in the Defence Forces and the Culture Surrounding the Making of Complaints was established, by statutory instrument dated 20 June 2024, by the Tánaiste and Minister for Defence. Its short title is the ‘Defence Forces Tribunal’.

3. Why was the Tribunal established?

An Independent Review Group (the ‘IRG’) recommended that a statutory fact-finding process be established in order to identify systemic failures, if any, in the Defence Forces’ complaints processes for dealing with complaints of abuse. The Government acted on that recommendation and established this Tribunal of Inquiry. The Tribunal is tasked with inquiring, urgently, into several matters relating to the effectiveness of the complaints processes and the culture within the Defences Forces when dealing with complaints of abuse. The Tribunal is also investigating the response to complaints about the use of hazardous chemicals in Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel.

4. Is the Tribunal the same as the IRG?

No. The Tribunal is an entirely separate and distinct body and its work is not connected in any way with the IRG.

5. What period of time is covered by the Tribunal’s inquiry?

The Tribunal is tasked with investigating matters from the 1st of January 1983 until the 20th of June 2024.

6. What is the Tribunal’s status?

The Tribunal is an independent body established pursuant to the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Acts 1921 – 2011.

7. What are the Tribunal’s Terms of Reference?

      • The Tribunal’s Terms of Reference set out the scope of the Tribunal’s work and list the various matters into which it must inquire and on which it must report. The Tribunal cannot investigate matters that fall outside the scope of its Terms of Reference.
      • The Tribunal’s principal task is to examine how complaints of abuse were handled in the Defence Forces for the period mentioned above (that is, from 1 January 1983 until 20 June 2024). It also has other matters to investigate and these are set out below.
      • ‘Abuse’, in this context, means discrimination, bullying, harassment, physical torture or assault, psychological harm, sexual harassment and any form of sexual misconduct (including sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault and rape).
      • The full Terms of Reference are available at www.toidf.ie and a summary of the matters into which the Tribunal must inquire is set out below.
The Tribunal will examine and report on:
      1. whether the processes for dealing with complaints of abuse that were available to members of the Defence Forces and civilian employees and civil servants working within the Defence Forces and civil servants working in the Department of Defence, were appropriate and fit for purpose;
      2. whether these processes were followed; and
      3. what was the response to and outcome of complaints of abuse that were made and whether there were ‘systemic failures’ in the processes for dealing with those complaints.
The Tribunal will also consider and report on:
      1. whether making complaints of abuse was something that was actively deterred in the Defence Forces or whether there was a culture that discouraged people from making complaints of abuse; and
      2. whether those who made complaints of abuse were subjected to any kind of retaliation or reprisal or intimidation or penalty.
In addition, the Tribunal will investigate and report on:
      1. the nature and performance of the statutory role of the Minister for Defence and the Department of Defence (going back to 1 January 1983) in the systems and procedures for dealing with complaints of abuse; and
      2. the responses to complaints about the use of hazardous chemicals within Air Corps’ Headquarters at Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel, and the adequacy of the complaints processes in the light of those responses.

8. Will the Tribunal investigate actual complaints that were made and will it make findings in relation to those complaints?

No. The Tribunal is concerned only with inquiring into the processes for dealing with complaints of abuse in the Defence Forces. It does not and cannot investigate whether the actual complaints were well founded. In other words, the Tribunal will not be investigating whether the matters that gave rise to a complaint of abuse occurred. Rather, it is concerned with how the Defence Forces responded to complaints of abuse after they had been made. For example, if a member complained about being assaulted, the Tribunal cannot investigate whether that alleged assault actually occurred. Its task is to examine what happened after the complaint about assault was made, what processes were involved and whether those processes were adequate. While it is not necessary for the Tribunal to know the name of a person against whom a complaint was made, it would be helpful for the Tribunal to know that person’s rank and station and to receive information about how and to whom a complaint was made.

9. If a person had reason to make a complaint to the Defence Forces during the period from 1 January 1983 to 20 June 2024 (the relevant period) but did not do so, can that person still provide a statement and/or information to the Tribunal?

Yes. In addition to investigating the complaints processes, the Tribunal is inquiring into the culture surrounding the making of complaints of abuse in the Defence Forces during the relevant period. If a person did not make a formal complaint of abuse because of a fear of reprisal or a belief that it would serve no purpose, that information would be relevant to the Tribunal’s inquiry and any such person is invited to submit a statement to the Tribunal.

10. Who is leading the Inquiry?

The Tribunal’s inquiry is led by a Judge who is described as the ‘Sole Member’ of the Tribunal. She is Ms. Justice Ann Power, a Judge of the Court of Appeal and a former Judge of the European Court of Human Rights.

11. Is the Tribunal process like a trial?

No, the Tribunal is not a trial. It is an inquisitorial process, not an adversarial one. The Tribunal is tasked with establishing or finding out the truth about the complaints processes within the Defence Forces in relation to complaints of abuse.

Some people will have relevant evidence about the complaints processes and will want to give that evidence to the Tribunal. Others may disagree with that evidence and may want to challenge it. The Tribunal must be fair to everyone who appears before it. It will consider all the evidence that it receives in order to find out or establish where the truth lies. Its objective is to make findings about the complaints processes, report on those findings and offer recommendations for the future.

12. What is the role of Counsel to the Tribunal?

Counsel to the Tribunal’s primary role is to collect the relevant evidence and to assist the Judge or ‘Sole Member’ by presenting that evidence at hearings and questioning the witnesses who come before the Tribunal.

13. Where will the Tribunal hold its public hearings?

Public hearings will be held at the Tribunal’s premises which are in Smithfield, Dublin. The address is The Infinity Building, Third Floor, George’s Court, George’s Lane, Smithfield, Dublin 7, D07 E98Y.

14. When will public hearings commence?

The public hearings stage of the Tribunal’s work will begin when the private investigative stage of its work has been completed. The investigative stage is expected to take several months.

15. Can a person make a statement or a submission, anonymously, to the Tribunal?

No. The Tribunal must act with fairness at all times and could not make findings on the basis of anonymous statements.

16. How can a person make a statement or provide information to the Tribunal?

This may be done by either sending in the written statement to the Tribunal or by filling out a form that is available on the Tribunal’s website (www.toidf.ie) and sending that form to the Tribunal. Statements or completed forms should be sent to the Tribunal’s Solicitor at Defence Forces Tribunal, Infinity Building, Third Floor, George’s Court, George’s Lane, Smithfield, Dublin 7, D07 E98Y.

Statements or forms may also be sent by email to [email protected]

The Tribunal is asking any person who has information that is relevant to its Terms of Reference to contact the Tribunal’s Solicitor and to give that information by close of business on 30 September 2024.

17. Does the Tribunal provide assistance to a person making a statement?

If someone has a difficulty or a problem with writing a statement, there is a person available to the Tribunal who can help by taking down or transcribing what she is told. Anyone who has difficulty submitting a written statement may make an appointment with this person by calling the Tribunal office on (01) 539 1550.

18. If a person submits a statement to the Tribunal, will that person be called for interview, and if so, when?

A person who has submitted a statement that is relevant to the Tribunal’s Terms of Reference, is likely to be called for interview by the Tribunal’s legal team during the Autumn of 2024. If a person has a difficulty attending for interview at the Tribunal’s premises in Dublin, then arrangements may be made to hold interviews in other locations.

19. If a statement is submitted to the Tribunal will the person who made it be required to give evidence at the public hearings stage?

If a person submits a statement to the Tribunal that is relevant to its Terms of Reference, such a person may be called to give evidence.

20. If a person is called to give evidence at the public hearing phase, will that person be subjected to cross-examination?

Any witnesses who give evidence to the Tribunal may be cross-examined on their testimony if what they say is being challenged.

21. If a person is called to give evidence to the Tribunal, will this be in public?

The Tribunal is a public inquiry so, generally, oral hearings will be held in public. However, the law permits a Tribunal to hold a hearing otherwise than in public if, in the opinion of the Tribunal, it is in the public interest expedient to do so for reasons connected with the subject matter of the inquiry or the nature of the evidence to be given.

Some of the evidence that the Tribunal will receive may be particularly sensitive in nature and where an application is made for a hearing to be held otherwise than in public, the Tribunal will hear submissions from the relevant parties and will consider and decide on each application as it arises.

22. Can a person submit a statement to the Tribunal without a solicitor?

Yes. It is not necessary for a person to seek legal advice or have legal representation before submitting a statement or providing information to the Tribunal. Information about how to submit a statement to the Tribunal is available on the Tribunal’s website: www.toidf.ie

23. Who will have legal representation before the Tribunal?

Although the Tribunal’s inquiry is inquisitorial and not adversarial, those who have a sufficiently direct interest in the matters being inquired into may be granted representation by the Tribunal.

To date, full representation has been granted to the Defence Forces and to the Department of Defence which means that they will have legal representation at the investigative stage and the public hearings stage of the Tribunal’s work.

The representative bodies listed below have been granted limited legal representation during the investigative stage of the Tribunal’s work. A decision on their applications for representation during the public hearings stage has been deferred.

        1. Permanent Defence Forces Other Ranks Representative Association (PDFORRA);
        2. Women of Honour;
        3. Defence Forces Justice Alliance;
        4. 34th Platoon Army Apprentice School Justice Group;
        5. Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors;
        6. DF Whistleblowers Protected Disclosure Justice Group; and
        7. Defence Forces Lariam Justice Group.

Any additional applications, in writing, for representation during the Tribunal’s investigative phase will be considered at the appropriate time.

Before the Tribunal may consider an individual person’s application for legal representation, the Tribunal would need to see that individual’s statement.

24. What is the timeline for completion of the Tribunal’s work?

The Tribunal must endeavour to complete its work within three (3) years from the date of its establishment which was 20 June 2024.

25. How can I keep up to date on Tribunal matters?

The ‘Notices’ section on the Tribunal’s website (www.toidf.ie) has up to date information regarding the Tribunal and it is advisable to check the website, regularly, for updates.