Dear Councillor, Please don’t give any Seanad Election 2025 preference to Cathal Berry or Gerard Craughwell

Dear Councillor,

My name is Gavin Tobin and I am the spokesperson for the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors. We represent serving & former Irish Air Corps personnel injured by toxic workplace chemicals.

I am also one of the three whistle-blowers that revealed the ongoing workplace chemical Health & Safety tragedy at the Irish Air Corps bases in Baldonnel, Co. Dublin & formerly Gormanston, Co. Meath by making a Protected Disclosure to then Minister Simon Coveney in December 2015.

I believe myself and hundreds of my colleagues were injured by atrocious working conditions in the 1990s whilst working as apprentices, aircraft technicians and support personnel.

I worked in the exact location below  where I have recorded 14 untimely deaths just in this location out of 110 untimely deaths overall. That is Ardrox 666 which contained hexavalent chromium (the Erin Brockovich chemical) running down the walls from the extractor fan.  The smaller barrel dissolving itself contains Ardrox 1074 with hydrofluoric acid an exceptionally dangerous chemical, this chemical can dissolve glass.

When the Air Corps Pilatus aircraft were being equipped with smoke generators in late 2015, for the centenary flypast to commemorate the 1916 rising,  I was made aware of an accident due to chemical exposure where two technicians were injured and when I contacted the HSA to ask if this incident was reported a workplace accident I found it was not.  This lead me to realise that the working conditions that I believe made me & others sick in the 1990s still prevailed in 2015.

In parallel Sergeant Patrick Gorman who sat on the National Executive of PDFORRA wrote a letter, raising chemical Health & Safety concerns, to the Defence Forces about the lack of chemical Health & Safety at Baldonnel including the lack of risk assessments, lack of PPE and lack of risk specific health surveillance. The General Secretary of PDFORRA later revealed to me that this letter was never responded to.

Sgt Gorman was one of the whistle-blowers who reported this wrongdoing to Minister Simon Coveney in early 2016 and was constructively dismissed from the Air Corps as a result of doing the right thing.

We also learned that as early as 1995 the Irish Air Corps had independent air quality testing carried out at Baldonnel and found the levels of a toxic solvent in the building where I recorded 14 untimely deaths was 175 parts per million when the then legal limit was 50ppm. This air quality test failure was withheld from personnel who worked there and no actions were taken to reduce or remove the exposure.

In 1995/1997 further testing was carried out by state body Forbairt which again found chemical hazard issues and recommended that all personnel be issued with PPE and be given chemical handling training. This was not actioned until 20 years later after the three whistle-blowers reported the Air Corps to the Health & Safety Authority who threatened legal action against the Air Corps unless they heeded their demands.

You can read about Air Corps / HSA interactions here

We also learned that the State Claims Agency had been auditing the Defence Forces Heath & Safety from 2006 to 2016 and were giving them awards for excellence in Health & Safety and using this success to  award themselves performance related gratuities for so called “improvements” in risk profile. These pre-arranged audits “by appointment” are simply not credible.

*****

Cathal Berry

In early 2020 former Commandant Cathal Berry threw his hat in the ring  for a Dáil seat in the Kildare South constituency.  Cathal Berry is a medical doctor and we thought & hoped he would be keen to help us work to reduce suffering & untimely deaths amongst exposed Irish Air Corps colleagues…how wrong we were.

I did personally offer to canvas for Cathal Berry and indeed some Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors did actually canvas for him. There was some hope amongst serving and former Defence Forces personnel that Cathal Berry would give a voice to those harmed by multiple scandals in the Defence Forces including the Air Corps toxic chemical exposure scandal, the Lariam scandal and later the Women of Honour Scandal but there are more.

Alas Cathal Berry had zero interest in anyone wronged by the Defence Forces. He appeared to be there to represent the interests of the Defence Forces management and spent more of his time in the Dáil pushing for more equipment & weapons.

Cathal Berry also voted with the Fianna Fail / Fine Gael / Green government the vast majority of the time.  A vote for Cathal Berry is certainly NOT an independent vote. 

We would all like to see a better equipped & funded Defence Forces but this cannot be at the cost of trampling on those who were harmed during their service and Cathal Berry showed absolutely zero interest in helping those wronged.

We formally asked Cathal Berry for help on on the 10th of January 2021 and this letter can be read here. Cathal Berry NEVER responded to this letter. 

A further 22 fresh deaths have occurred since we first sought help from Cathal Berry, some of these people could have been saved. 

*****

Senator Gerard Craughwell

In April 2017 I made a protect a protected disclosure to a number of politicians in the Oireachtas including the then Taoiseach Enda Kenny, as well as a number of TDs & Senators including Senator Gerard Craughwell.

In my disclosure complained that there had been injury to serving & former personnel and their families with suspected 20 untimely deaths.

        • I complained that the DoD had appointed someone with no medical background or toxicological background to investigate the whistle-blowers protected disclosure to Minister Coveney.
        • I complained that the State Claims Agency was abusing its position by appealing my High Court discovery decision and I suggested that a better use of these resources would be to conduct a scientific inquiry as had been conducted after a similar health & Safety scandal in the Royal Australian Air Force over two decades ago.
        • I suggested that the state should intervene medically & with a scientific  enquiry like in the RAAF scandal.
        • I complained about the Air Corps misleading the WRC and I asked for help saving lives and reducing suffering.
        • I complained about the attempted shredding of Heath & Safety documentations including adverse air quality test reports.

Senator Gerard Craughwell who served in both the Irish Army and the British Army, never responded to the protected disclosure. 

In later years I passed Senator Gerard Craughwell a list of  untimely deaths which had then grown to 70+ and he again failed to respond to me.

Later on social media Senator Gerard Craughwell when seeking medical interventions to prevent unnecessary suffering of injured colleagues he attempted to paint me as selfishly attempting to speed up my own court case.

You can see our list of demands here

Since we asked Senator Gerard Craughwell for help in 2017 a further 39 personnel have suffered untimely deaths. Some of these personnel could have been saved but Senator Gerard Craughwell  chose to look the other way and not support us. Shame on him.

Senator Gerard Craughwell was the second highest independent senator to vote with the last Fine Gael / Fianna Fail / Green government. A vote for Gerard Craughwell is certainly NOT an independent vote. 

*****

Cathal Berry and Gerard Craughwell could have simultaneously looked for more resources for the Defence Forces on one hand and on the other hand sought medical interventions & other supports for Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors, Lariam Survivors & the Women of Honour but they both chose not to and in multiple instances actually downplayed our lived experiences.

Early in 2024 the Women of Honour were joined by the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors & the Defence Forces Justice Alliance to give a briefing to members of the Oireachtas prior to the vote to establish the Defence Forces Tribunal neither Dr Cathal Berry or Gerard Craughwell bothered to attend nor show any other support.

If these two men are elected to the Oireachtas we believe they will continue to have more loyalty to Lockheed Martin than to wronged serving & former Irish Defence Forces colleagues and this is morally wrong.

Full disclosure: I do have a personal injuries legal case pending against the state since 2013 for injuries I believe suffered during my service. I have been to the High Court 2016, Court of Appeal 2018, Supreme Court 2019 and the High Court again in 2023 to force compliance with the Supreme Court order of 2019 and all this just for discovery!

This decades long legal action should not in any way exclude me from the democratic process but I have been ghosted by Taoiseach Simon Harris, Tánaiste & Minister for Defence Micheál Martin and previously Leo Varadkar. Even President Michael D Higgins is currently refusing to meet with me or indeed any other #IrishAirCorps survivors.

Please do not vote for either Cathal Berry or Gerard Craughwell and give your independent vote for a true independent candidate not government supporting pretend independents.

Thank You.

Failed general election Independents Cathal Barry and Matt Shanahan to run for Seanad

Seanad office receives 70 nominations in advance of Wednesday deadline for candidates backed by professional bodies

Former Independent TD Cathal Berry who lost his South Kildare Seat in the general election is to run in the Seanad election as is former Waterford Independent TD Matt Shanahan, both of them from the Regional Independent group in the last Dáil.

Mr Berry, a former Army Ranger and medical doctor who received nominations from Oireachtas members, said “national security is a priority around Europe at the moment … So you need people with a particular expertise to have a mature conversation about it. And that’s what the Seanad is all about.”

The Upper House is seen as a way for former TDs to remain in the Oireachtas to win back their Dáil seat in the following general election.

Read full article by Marie O’Halloran at the Irish Times 

https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2024/12/18/failed-general-election-independents-cathal-barry-and-matt-shanahan-to-run-for-seanad/https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41414152.html

*****

Delay – Deny – Die

A private message from an Irish Air Corps survivor to Cathal Berry & his insensitive, uncaring response two month later

20th June 2020

Good morning Cathal,

My name is Pat Reilly and I served in the Air Corps from August 1991 to October 2013. I now live in Queensland, Australia, having moved here in May 2014 from our home in Walsh Island, Offaly. I was an aircraft maintenance engineer for the first fourteen years in the Air Corps and later became a photographer. I think I may have worked with you at one stage as a photographer.

I am writing to you regarding the toxic chemical scandal that has been destroying lives of former and serving Air Corps personnel but has been continually pushed aside by the Irish Government with a myriad of excuses including now, Covid-19, which they say is stopping legal documents from being signed due to social distancing.

I hope you don’t mind me sharing my story with you as I feel isolated here in Australia other than communicating occasionally with other veterans who are affected and very occasionally with the legal team who are trying their best to cut through the barriers the government are putting up back in Ireland.

While I’m no longer a voter in Ireland I’m still a citizen and I’m wondering can you ask a few questions around the chemical subject in the Dail as it has gone very quite the last year or so. I understand that Covid and the election has taken up a lot of time in the Dail but its this exact situation that I fear will be used to hide the scandal further as it seems to already have somewhat.

I would love to know when Minister Convey is launching his investigation into the subject as he promised and how long it will take. Time is critical in this matter as more and more of us are getting sicker by the day. It’s heartbreaking seeing relatively young men (possibly women also) cut down in their prime. Not being able to work and support their families and suffering debilitating symptoms day after day.

I’ll be honest and tell you there are tears flowing down my face typing this.I moved here to get away from Ireland and the job I loved because I was being bullied by my superiors in the Air Corps for being sick but now I’m unemployed due to my illness and trying to live off my Defence Forces pension and income insurance which may dry up any month now.

I feel worthless and a waster as I always gave 100% in any work I’ve done despite my illness. The only thing that’s keeping me sane and going in some respects is my medicinal Cannabis Oil which I was prescribed here last year after approval by the Australian government.

I’ve even lost the support of my wife who cant take our situation anymore and I fear for our marriage which is my second marriage after my first one broke up partially due to my illness also.

It seems that as soon as I hit my 40’s my body can no longer fight off my symptoms. Without my medication I have severe tremors and shakes and uncontrollable anxiety due to my sympathetic nervous system being damaged by the chemicals. This system also affects things like my bowels and stomach. It’s not a good experience when one soils themselves at work in front of customers.

I also have neuropathy in my legs where I cant feel and I lose control of my legs causing my knees to buckle and me to loose balance. My immune system is also damaged to the point I react to any sort of chemical smell, foods, materials and many other triggers. I cant breath properly and choke often due to damage in my nasal cavities which of course interrupts my sleep. Finally, I have a huge amount of pre-cancerous cells sitting their waiting to ruin me further, my doctor said she’s never seen this in anybody under 75.

All this has really taken its toll and I’m at the point I feel like giving up and I will share with you I was on the end of a rope earlier this year but I managed to talk myself out of it as I don’t want to be another statistic to add to the 78 dead already from untimely deaths in Baldonnel.

I decided there and then I didn’t want the government to win, I want them to apologize for the years of calling me a bluffer, a malingerer, telling ,me it’s all in my head. I also think at this stage we need a support package. I can no longer work no matter how much I tell myself I’d be ok working and I can no longer legally drive due to my medication. It’s literally like Russian roulette. I could work for a week or a day and then I’m too sick and have to go home which is why my current ‘employer’ (Apple) put me on an insurance plan as I became too unreliable despite having citations from the CEO of Apple for interactions with customers who emailed him to praise my work.

I could now be a Sgt Major in the Air Corps or an officer or be retired on a Flt/Sgts pension but this illness put a stop to all that. Instead I’m scraping by on a few hundred dollars and I’m stuck renting as no bank will touch me now and it sounds strange but I can’t even afford to move home to Ireland as logistically it would cost too much even to just give up and go.

I could go on all day explaining my illness and situation its that complex. I try to keep up a happy appearance on social media as some of my family and my 86 year old mother don’t know my situation and I don’t want her to be worried in her last few years.

I hope you don’t mind me writing to you as I needed to get this off my chest to somebody other than my wife and somebody like yourself who’s served and is now in a position to ask why we are being forgotten. The ministers involved keep using litigation as an excuse not to address the scandal as several of us have cases against the Dept but these are being dragged on and on the past six years with delay, deny, die tactics which is apparently the norm.

Thanks for listening Cathal and Sláinte,

Pat Reilly.

Berry’s utterly insensitive response, Pat very obviously is not “keeping well”

Dr Cathal Berry TD’s utteerly insensitive & unsympathetic response two months later disingenuously describing the Air Corps scandal as a legacy issue even though the Air Corps were issued chemical contravention notices as recently as December 2023.

I hope you are keeping well. I am sorry for only getting back to you now.

I do understand that the Air Corps Chemical Abuse scandal is a legacy issue and needs to be addressed properly. 

I will certainly raise this soon with the Minister at an appropriate time.

This was the one and only communication Pat had from Cathal Berry and Oireachtas records show that Deputy Berry has NEVER raised this issue in the Dáil chamber.

Perhaps Deputy can put on the record the response from the Minister if he ever bothered to raise it outside the public record.

*****

Dr Berry this is NOT a legacy issue as you pretend and it most certainly is a live issue for those suffering needlessly and dying young.

But we know you don’t care, shame on you.

Read an article from Ken Foxe dated 21st May 2024 on TheStory.ie

 

Health and Safety Authority inspections of Air Corps base at Baldonnel uncovers litany of safety issues

What does ChatGPT AI think of Cathal Berry’s abandonment of Air Corps whistleblowers?

ChatGPT said when asked…

“Why has Cathal Berry turned his back on Irish Air Corps whistleblowers?”

Cathal Berry has faced criticism for his stance on Irish Air Corps whistleblowers, particularly regarding his response to their allegations of wrongdoing and poor treatment within the organization.

While Berry has historically been vocal about the need for whistleblower protection and accountability in the military, his handling of specific cases involving the Irish Air Corps has raised eyebrows.

The controversy centers on his position as a public representative and his past ties to the Defence Forces. Berry, a former Army officer, was initially seen as an ally to whistleblowers within the military, advocating for reforms to address systemic issues. However, in recent years, particularly in relation to whistleblower claims from the Irish Air Corps, Berry has been perceived as less supportive, or even dismissive, of the concerns raised by those involved.

Some of the criticism stems from Berry’s reluctance to fully endorse or take a stronger public stance on specific whistleblower cases, possibly due to his complex relationship with the Defence Forces, where loyalty and internal solidarity can be deeply ingrained. His critics argue that, by not robustly supporting the Air Corps whistleblowers, Berry has failed to live up to his earlier promises of championing transparency and reform.

Others suggest that Berry’s political pragmatism may be influencing his decisions. As a member of the Dáil (the Irish parliament), his position on sensitive military matters may be influenced by a desire to maintain relationships within the Defence Forces or to avoid further controversy on an issue that could alienate potential allies or voters who are connected to the military.

In summary, while Cathal Berry has historically supported whistleblowers in principle, his perceived lack of strong support for the Irish Air Corps whistleblowers has led to accusations that he has not followed through on those commitments, possibly due to political or professional considerations.

Defence Forces Tribunal – Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is a Tribunal of Inquiry?

A Tribunal of Inquiry is a body set up to inquire into matters that are of urgent public importance. It is purely a fact-finding and investigative body. At the end of its inquiry, a Tribunal sends a Report to the Oireachtas. The Report sets out the Tribunal’s findings and makes recommendations for the future.

2. When was the Defence Forces Tribunal established?

The Tribunal of Inquiry into Issues Relating to the Complaints Processes in the Defence Forces and the Culture Surrounding the Making of Complaints was established, by statutory instrument dated 20 June 2024, by the Tánaiste and Minister for Defence. Its short title is the ‘Defence Forces Tribunal’.

3. Why was the Tribunal established?

An Independent Review Group (the ‘IRG’) recommended that a statutory fact-finding process be established in order to identify systemic failures, if any, in the Defence Forces’ complaints processes for dealing with complaints of abuse. The Government acted on that recommendation and established this Tribunal of Inquiry. The Tribunal is tasked with inquiring, urgently, into several matters relating to the effectiveness of the complaints processes and the culture within the Defences Forces when dealing with complaints of abuse. The Tribunal is also investigating the response to complaints about the use of hazardous chemicals in Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel.

4. Is the Tribunal the same as the IRG?

No. The Tribunal is an entirely separate and distinct body and its work is not connected in any way with the IRG.

5. What period of time is covered by the Tribunal’s inquiry?

The Tribunal is tasked with investigating matters from the 1st of January 1983 until the 20th of June 2024.

6. What is the Tribunal’s status?

The Tribunal is an independent body established pursuant to the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Acts 1921 – 2011.

7. What are the Tribunal’s Terms of Reference?

      • The Tribunal’s Terms of Reference set out the scope of the Tribunal’s work and list the various matters into which it must inquire and on which it must report. The Tribunal cannot investigate matters that fall outside the scope of its Terms of Reference.
      • The Tribunal’s principal task is to examine how complaints of abuse were handled in the Defence Forces for the period mentioned above (that is, from 1 January 1983 until 20 June 2024). It also has other matters to investigate and these are set out below.
      • ‘Abuse’, in this context, means discrimination, bullying, harassment, physical torture or assault, psychological harm, sexual harassment and any form of sexual misconduct (including sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault and rape).
      • The full Terms of Reference are available at www.toidf.ie and a summary of the matters into which the Tribunal must inquire is set out below.
The Tribunal will examine and report on:
      1. whether the processes for dealing with complaints of abuse that were available to members of the Defence Forces and civilian employees and civil servants working within the Defence Forces and civil servants working in the Department of Defence, were appropriate and fit for purpose;
      2. whether these processes were followed; and
      3. what was the response to and outcome of complaints of abuse that were made and whether there were ‘systemic failures’ in the processes for dealing with those complaints.
The Tribunal will also consider and report on:
      1. whether making complaints of abuse was something that was actively deterred in the Defence Forces or whether there was a culture that discouraged people from making complaints of abuse; and
      2. whether those who made complaints of abuse were subjected to any kind of retaliation or reprisal or intimidation or penalty.
In addition, the Tribunal will investigate and report on:
      1. the nature and performance of the statutory role of the Minister for Defence and the Department of Defence (going back to 1 January 1983) in the systems and procedures for dealing with complaints of abuse; and
      2. the responses to complaints about the use of hazardous chemicals within Air Corps’ Headquarters at Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel, and the adequacy of the complaints processes in the light of those responses.

8. Will the Tribunal investigate actual complaints that were made and will it make findings in relation to those complaints?

No. The Tribunal is concerned only with inquiring into the processes for dealing with complaints of abuse in the Defence Forces. It does not and cannot investigate whether the actual complaints were well founded. In other words, the Tribunal will not be investigating whether the matters that gave rise to a complaint of abuse occurred. Rather, it is concerned with how the Defence Forces responded to complaints of abuse after they had been made. For example, if a member complained about being assaulted, the Tribunal cannot investigate whether that alleged assault actually occurred. Its task is to examine what happened after the complaint about assault was made, what processes were involved and whether those processes were adequate. While it is not necessary for the Tribunal to know the name of a person against whom a complaint was made, it would be helpful for the Tribunal to know that person’s rank and station and to receive information about how and to whom a complaint was made.

9. If a person had reason to make a complaint to the Defence Forces during the period from 1 January 1983 to 20 June 2024 (the relevant period) but did not do so, can that person still provide a statement and/or information to the Tribunal?

Yes. In addition to investigating the complaints processes, the Tribunal is inquiring into the culture surrounding the making of complaints of abuse in the Defence Forces during the relevant period. If a person did not make a formal complaint of abuse because of a fear of reprisal or a belief that it would serve no purpose, that information would be relevant to the Tribunal’s inquiry and any such person is invited to submit a statement to the Tribunal.

10. Who is leading the Inquiry?

The Tribunal’s inquiry is led by a Judge who is described as the ‘Sole Member’ of the Tribunal. She is Ms. Justice Ann Power, a Judge of the Court of Appeal and a former Judge of the European Court of Human Rights.

11. Is the Tribunal process like a trial?

No, the Tribunal is not a trial. It is an inquisitorial process, not an adversarial one. The Tribunal is tasked with establishing or finding out the truth about the complaints processes within the Defence Forces in relation to complaints of abuse.

Some people will have relevant evidence about the complaints processes and will want to give that evidence to the Tribunal. Others may disagree with that evidence and may want to challenge it. The Tribunal must be fair to everyone who appears before it. It will consider all the evidence that it receives in order to find out or establish where the truth lies. Its objective is to make findings about the complaints processes, report on those findings and offer recommendations for the future.

12. What is the role of Counsel to the Tribunal?

Counsel to the Tribunal’s primary role is to collect the relevant evidence and to assist the Judge or ‘Sole Member’ by presenting that evidence at hearings and questioning the witnesses who come before the Tribunal.

13. Where will the Tribunal hold its public hearings?

Public hearings will be held at the Tribunal’s premises which are in Smithfield, Dublin. The address is The Infinity Building, Third Floor, George’s Court, George’s Lane, Smithfield, Dublin 7, D07 E98Y.

14. When will public hearings commence?

The public hearings stage of the Tribunal’s work will begin when the private investigative stage of its work has been completed. The investigative stage is expected to take several months.

15. Can a person make a statement or a submission, anonymously, to the Tribunal?

No. The Tribunal must act with fairness at all times and could not make findings on the basis of anonymous statements.

16. How can a person make a statement or provide information to the Tribunal?

This may be done by either sending in the written statement to the Tribunal or by filling out a form that is available on the Tribunal’s website (www.toidf.ie) and sending that form to the Tribunal. Statements or completed forms should be sent to the Tribunal’s Solicitor at Defence Forces Tribunal, Infinity Building, Third Floor, George’s Court, George’s Lane, Smithfield, Dublin 7, D07 E98Y.

Statements or forms may also be sent by email to [email protected]

The Tribunal is asking any person who has information that is relevant to its Terms of Reference to contact the Tribunal’s Solicitor and to give that information by close of business on 30 September 2024.

17. Does the Tribunal provide assistance to a person making a statement?

If someone has a difficulty or a problem with writing a statement, there is a person available to the Tribunal who can help by taking down or transcribing what she is told. Anyone who has difficulty submitting a written statement may make an appointment with this person by calling the Tribunal office on (01) 539 1550.

18. If a person submits a statement to the Tribunal, will that person be called for interview, and if so, when?

A person who has submitted a statement that is relevant to the Tribunal’s Terms of Reference, is likely to be called for interview by the Tribunal’s legal team during the Autumn of 2024. If a person has a difficulty attending for interview at the Tribunal’s premises in Dublin, then arrangements may be made to hold interviews in other locations.

19. If a statement is submitted to the Tribunal will the person who made it be required to give evidence at the public hearings stage?

If a person submits a statement to the Tribunal that is relevant to its Terms of Reference, such a person may be called to give evidence.

20. If a person is called to give evidence at the public hearing phase, will that person be subjected to cross-examination?

Any witnesses who give evidence to the Tribunal may be cross-examined on their testimony if what they say is being challenged.

21. If a person is called to give evidence to the Tribunal, will this be in public?

The Tribunal is a public inquiry so, generally, oral hearings will be held in public. However, the law permits a Tribunal to hold a hearing otherwise than in public if, in the opinion of the Tribunal, it is in the public interest expedient to do so for reasons connected with the subject matter of the inquiry or the nature of the evidence to be given.

Some of the evidence that the Tribunal will receive may be particularly sensitive in nature and where an application is made for a hearing to be held otherwise than in public, the Tribunal will hear submissions from the relevant parties and will consider and decide on each application as it arises.

22. Can a person submit a statement to the Tribunal without a solicitor?

Yes. It is not necessary for a person to seek legal advice or have legal representation before submitting a statement or providing information to the Tribunal. Information about how to submit a statement to the Tribunal is available on the Tribunal’s website: www.toidf.ie

23. Who will have legal representation before the Tribunal?

Although the Tribunal’s inquiry is inquisitorial and not adversarial, those who have a sufficiently direct interest in the matters being inquired into may be granted representation by the Tribunal.

To date, full representation has been granted to the Defence Forces and to the Department of Defence which means that they will have legal representation at the investigative stage and the public hearings stage of the Tribunal’s work.

The representative bodies listed below have been granted limited legal representation during the investigative stage of the Tribunal’s work. A decision on their applications for representation during the public hearings stage has been deferred.

        1. Permanent Defence Forces Other Ranks Representative Association (PDFORRA);
        2. Women of Honour;
        3. Defence Forces Justice Alliance;
        4. 34th Platoon Army Apprentice School Justice Group;
        5. Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors;
        6. DF Whistleblowers Protected Disclosure Justice Group; and
        7. Defence Forces Lariam Justice Group.

Any additional applications, in writing, for representation during the Tribunal’s investigative phase will be considered at the appropriate time.

Before the Tribunal may consider an individual person’s application for legal representation, the Tribunal would need to see that individual’s statement.

24. What is the timeline for completion of the Tribunal’s work?

The Tribunal must endeavour to complete its work within three (3) years from the date of its establishment which was 20 June 2024.

25. How can I keep up to date on Tribunal matters?

The ‘Notices’ section on the Tribunal’s website (www.toidf.ie) has up to date information regarding the Tribunal and it is advisable to check the website, regularly, for updates.

Defence Forces Tribunal – Legal representations & invitation for submissions

Upon the establishment of the Defence Forces Tribunal the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors representative group where concerned about an imbalance in legal resources between the Defence Forces & Department of Defence on the one hand and victims groups on the other.

We agreed with the Defence Forces Justice Alliance, the Women of Honour & other victims groups that legal representation was a must from the very start of the tribunal so that all our members can make comprehensive initial submissions with the benefit of legal oversight.

On the 25th of June 2024 Ms Justice Ann Power handed down a Ruling of the Tribunal on Applications for Representation Made on Behalf of Representative Bodies (please see extract and link to full ruling below).

We are delighted to announce the appointment of solicitor, Mr Norman Spicer, of Coleman Legal LLP as our legal representative for the tribunal.

Norman is a former member of the Defence Forces having served as a Gunner in Mc Kee barracks and can be contacted via the email address below.

[email protected]

We would encourage all colleagues with complaints of hazardous chemicals or abuse linked to same to make contact immediately so that submissions can be made within the recently extended deadline of the 30th September 2024.

*****

Extract From Ruling

Application was made by Mr Gavin Tobin, on behalf of the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors, for partial representation.

In addition to complaints concerning ‘toxic chemicals’, this representative body, in its written application, also referred to matters that may fall within the definition of abuse as set out in the Terms of Reference.

The Tribunal is satisfied that the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors group as a sufficiently direct interest in the Terms of Reference to be granted limited representation during the investigative stage of the Tribunal’s work and it is so ordered.

Limited representation is granted to the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors for the following purposes:

(a) assisting individual members who have information relevant to Terms of Reference (vii) and assisting such individual members to the extent that they have information concerning complaints of abuse as defined in the Terms of Reference and which is relevant to paragraphs (i) to (v) thereof and who wish to submit statements to the Tribunal in relation thereto;

(b) attending upon any such members if they are called for interview during the investigative stage of the Tribunal; and

(c) making submissions as an organisation and on behalf of its membership in respect of the Terms of Reference.

Having considered the written and oral application made herein, the Tribunal is satisfied that a grant of representation to the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors in these terms is sufficient to cover that representative body’s interests during the investigative stage of the Tribunal’s work.

The Tribunal defers its decision in respect of the extent of legal representation, if any, during the public hearings stage of its work.

Download the full ruling of Ms Justice Ann Power from 25th July 2024 below. 

https://www.toidf.ie/app/uploads/2024/07/Ruling-of-the-Tribunal-on-Applications-for-Representation-25-July-2024.pdf

Haulbowline cadet canteen shut down after inspectors find exits locked and mould

There were also hazardous chemicals stored in open containers at the Haulbowline Naval Base in Cork late last year

Haulbowline  Larry Cummins

A health and safety inspection at Naval Service headquarters resulted in the shutting down of a cadet canteen area after emergency exits were found blocked as well as damp and mould.

An inspector from the Health and Safety Authority visited the Haulbowline Naval Base in Cork late last year discovering fire doors that weren’t being properly maintained, open attic space between buildings, and storage of hazardous chemicals in open containers.

There were serious issues with a cadet mess building on the base with lower emergency exits “blocked by stairs” along with evidence of damp and mould on walls and floors.

The health and safety inspector asked the Naval Service to conduct an immediate review of the building in terms of its “fitness for use or occupation”. In early January, the Defence Forces wrote to the Health and Safety Authority (HSA) to say it was no longer in active use.

A letter from Defence Forces Headquarters said:

“I can confirm and as per [our] action plan the Naval Service Cadets Mess is not used to accommodate any personnel following HSA inspection. Cadets [and] personnel were moved to alternative accommodation within the base.”

Read full article by Ken Foxe at the Irish Examiner 

https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41414152.html

*****

Despite repeated interventions by the Health & Safety Authority the Defence Forces cannot seem to get their houses in order.

The previous Chief of Staff, Vice Admiral Mark Mellett was at the helm of the Defence Forces when the HSA threatened legal action against the Irish Air Corps. 

Subsequently,  Vice Admiral Mellett heaped praise upon then Brigadier General Seán Clancy as GOC Air Corps claiming that “Sean Clancy did a great job cleaning up the Air Corps” albeit after serving 30+ years in the same Air Corps he supposedly cleaned up.

Two service branches now under the command of Chief of Staff,  Lieutenant General Sean Clancy, namely the Air Corps and the Naval Service, have yet again come under the spotlight for poor Health & Safety including hazardous chemical breaches. 

The Defence Forces have so far been as high as the Supreme Court in attempts to defend against legal cases relating to poor health & safety and unprotected hazardous chemical exposure yet the HSA continue to find them in contravention of legislation designed to protected their personnel. 

There is no accountability in this organisation when it comes to incompetence & negligence on Health & Safety issues because it simply does not have a culture of Health & Safety, a fact which successive Defence Ministers have been more than happy to ignore. 

Delay – Deny – Die

Helicopter crews suing MOD, claiming exhaust fumes caused their cancer

The personnel claim toxic fumes emitted from the aircraft caused their illness, and they are accusing the MOD of being negligent about the risk to their health.

The Sea King is one of the helicopter types whose exhaust fumes allegedly caused cancer among a number of former aircrew

The Ministry of Defence is being sued by crew members who have been diagnosed with cancer after serving on military helicopters.

The personnel claim toxic fumes emitted from the aircraft caused their illness, and they are accusing the MOD of being negligent about the risk to their health.

According to a report by The Times, crew members who served on board helicopters such as the Sea King, Wessex, Puma and Chinook are among those who are taking legal action.

It includes those who’ve served in the Royal Navy, Army and Royal Air Force from a variety of ranks.

They are saying they were exposed to concentrated levels of toxic exhaust fumes during their flights.

The say they have subsequently been diagnosed with illnesses such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, multiple myeloma, lung cancer, throat cancer and testicular cancer.

At least three of the former personnel affected have already passed away, while others have been diagnosed with terminal cancer.

Five former service personnel have received out-of-court settlements, including a former flight sergeant who trained Prince William in the RAF.

It is being claimed the Government knew about the risk posed by the Sea King’s exhaust as far back as 1999, but aircrew continued to fly on board without safety precautions.

A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: “We hugely value our service personnel and veterans and owe a debt of gratitude to all those who serve, often with great personal sacrifice.

“We continually review our policies to ensure they are aligned with good practice and protect our people from harm.

Service personnel and veterans who believe they have suffered ill health due to service from 6 April 2005 have the existing and long-standing right to apply for no-fault compensation under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme.”

Read full article on Forces.net…

https://www.forces.net/technology/aircraft/helicopter-crews-suing-mod-claiming-exhaust-fumes-caused-their-cancer

*****

Delay – Deny – Die

Is anything safe at Air Corps base?

Damaged drains, cables across hangar floors, a leaking oven, oil spills and a risk of Legionnaires’ disease… these are just a few of the workplace hazards inspectors found at Casement Aerodrome

Health and safety inspections on the Irish Air Corps discovered spills of hazardous brake fluid, a water supply that carried the risk of Legionnaires disease, fall risks, damaged drains and trailing cables across hangar floors.

The Defence Forces were also issued with a contravention notice by the Health & Safety Authority (HSA) over the use of some chemicals without proper training of personnel.

A separate report from December said that several safety data sheets were outdated and recommended additional training on the handling of specific restricted chemicals. 

Read full article by Ken Foxe at the Irish Mail on Sunday via Pressreader…

https://www.pressreader.com/article/281728389626905

*****

Delay – Deny – Die

Air Corps member ‘penalised’ for protected disclosure

The Dáil has heard that several long-serving members of the Air Corps have been penalised for having made protective disclosures which flagged concerns over health and safety.

An Irish Air Corps workshop in Engineering Wing in 2007

Richard Boyd Barrett, People Before Profit – Solidarity TD, said that the disclosures related to using “dangerous chemicals”, the inability of all members of a team to have children and the lack of oversight of officers who were never held to account.

As a result of “the failure of the top brass”, the Mr Boyd Barrett said, one of the whistle-blower’s “felt that he had to retire”.

The man was unable to bring a case before the Workplace Relations Commission as he was advised, “you’re not an employee, you’re a worker”.

He has now agreed to have his story recounted to the Dáil, Mr Boyd Barrett told the deputies present.

“Sergeant Patrick Gorman served for 35 years in the Air Corps” with “an exemplary conduct rating”, having served in Lebanon, Somalia, Liberia and Chad, sometimes on multiple tours of duty, said Mr Boyd Barrett.

“He blew the whistle about his treatment and the treatment of other members of the Defence Forces… who made protected disclosures and who were penalised as a result.”

Children exposed to ‘contaminated clothing’

“They were wearing gloves, for example, that disintegrated on contact with chemicals that they were been asked to use” on aircraft repairs, he said of Sgt Gorman’s experiences.

“He was working with them for 18 years without a respirator, and it was only in the last two years that they got the respirator.

“In a group of seven people working in the sheet metal structural repair shop, seven of the people couldn’t have children, which seems quite incredible.”

Mr Boyd Barrett revealed that some of the carcinogenic chemicals involved were referenced in the eponymous film about the famous US whistleblower, Erin Brockovich, who successfully sued a utility firm for hundreds of millions of dollars for contaminating drinking water.

“Paint strippers that were banned elsewhere, still being used in the Irish Defence Forces,” he said.

Soldiers were not warned about contaminated clothing which they wore “home to their kids”, and which led to “it being mixed in with the washing of children and the rest of the family, potentially contaminating them with dangerous chemicals”.

Read the full article on the RTE website…

https://www.rte.ie/news/politics/2024/0502/1447056-dail-protected-discolsure/

*****

Sgt Gorman did the right thing in 2015/2016 by making Protected Disclosures to the Minister for Defence and the Health & Safety Authority which resulted in the HSA threatening legal action against Air Corps if they failed to implement urgent chemical health & safety reforms.

The Department’s own “O’Toole Report” and the almost three year HSA interventions fully vindicated Sgt Gorman. However, the response of the Irish Air Corps, the Department of Defence & successive Ministers (Coveney, Kehoe & Varadkar) was to ensure that Sgt Gorman was constructively dismissed.

The Air Corps Toxic Chemical Exposure Scandal broke in the Irish Examiner thanks to Joe Leogue in January 2017. Despite being raised in excess of twenty times in the Dáil, Seanad, Public Accounts Committee and even Varadkar’s confidence motion, this is the first time that RTE have reported on the scandal #106 dead.

Better late then never eh ?

Delay – Deny – Die