Watch Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire TD, the Sinn Fein Spokesperson for Defence, ask the recently appointed Minister for Defence Helen McEntee for an update on medical supports for exposed Air Corps personnel and watch her gaslight survivors & downplay their experience while ignoring and the issue of medical supports.

Transcript

Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire (Cork South-Central, Sinn Féin)

Question: 67. Deputy Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire asked the Minister for Defence further to recent Dáil Éireann debates, her views on past health and safety measures in the Air Corps; the actions she intends to take to support former aircraft maintenance and ancillary personnel; whether she intends to ensure their medical needs are met; and the other supports that can be offered to the category affected as a whole. [33426/26]

Helen McEntee (Meath East, Fine Gael)

I thank the Deputy for raising this. I acknowledge the Deputy’s engagement around the issue. I welcome the opportunity to set out the position as it stands. As there are multiple ongoing cases before the courts, as I have stated previously, I am limited in terms of what I can say so that I do not prejudice any of the ongoing litigation. The Deputy has said previously that it is possible to discuss both but I always want to be careful in that regard.

The advice available to me is that any view I have here needs to be carefully expressed so that we do not undermine the current process. Each claim has to receive the necessary case-specific analysis and consideration because what is clear is that each individual case is different to a certain extent.

I had a number of briefs from my officials on this. I then requested further detailed analysis from them. I have received that and carefully considered it. I convened a meeting with the Attorney General, representatives from the State Claims Agency and officials from my Department to discuss the matter further, having sought various different advices.

There are accusations that the State is prolonging legal proceedings as a deliberate tactic but that is not the case. It is important to stress that at every step of the way, the engagement that we have had, be it through the State Claims Agency working with individuals, has been to try to find a resolution and to work constructively with them.

The State Claims Agency has confirmed to me that it has made representations to the legal representatives of the litigants to explore the possibility of mediation to find a resolution to this issue. This is the way we want to move forward – that we can mediate and find a way forward – but those approaches have been rejected pending the cases having been set down for hearing.

I would encourage all those involved. We want to find a way forward. We do not want this to have to go to a court setting. There is an offer there from the State Claims Agency to work with it and with its legal representatives. We all want to find a mutually agreeable resolution, taking into consider what people have gone through and the current individual situation for those involved in this overall. I would encourage them to take up that offer and to engage more broadly with us.

Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire (Cork South-Central, Sinn Féin)

To be honest, that is a frustrating response because the Minister is well aware that I have outlined the point in the past. I would say there are issues in relation to the handling of the State Claims Agency of these cases. It is not appropriate for us to get into individual cases. I have never asked the Minister to do so. I have never tried to discuss individual cases in this Chamber, with the Minister or her predecessor. The issue here is in relation to a category of people who were acting in the service of the State. They were supporting the Defence Forces in terms of maintenance of aircraft. As the Air Corps Chemical Abuse Survivors group outlined, there have been 130 potential premature deaths. Clearly, we need to get to the bottom of that.

I am not asking for an update on the legal side, although I think there are issues in relation to the State Claims Agency’s approach. What I am asking for is what the Minister proposes to do, and which we discussed previously, in terms of the whole category, a potential package of health supports and health safeguarding, including forms of screening, and an accountability mechanism. There has to be an accountability mechanism as well.

Helen McEntee (Meath East, Fine Gael)

There are 22 active cases before the courts, which we are trying to engage with. Like the Deputy, I want to understand whether this is something that is happening on a wider scale but at the same time, we have to identify whether or not there is a consistent pattern here. Work has been done within the Department to see whether this is something that has been happening on a broader scale and whether there is a consistent pattern beyond the 22 people the Deputy is talking about here, and even within those cases where there is not a consistent pattern in terms of health implications or issues that have come to the fore. I am not for a second disputing the fact that the people who we are engaging with have health concerns and have had health concerns. There has never been a dispute that there needed to be better measures in place in terms of health and safety, whether it was gloves or handling. Whether the exposure had the overall effect, as has been set out by the individuals in the 22 active cases, is what is being discussed and engaged with at present. I would encourage all those to engage further in a mediation process that we have been actively trying to pursue because I think this the best route to be able to come to a conclusion for all of the individuals concerned.

Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire (Cork South-Central, Sinn Féin)

If there is a pattern, we are not going to find that out in the High Court. That will be found out through a process the Department seems to be considering. A memo was due to be brought to the Minister in the first quarter but we are past the first quarter now. That is what I recall the Minister saying. Has the Minister considered this memo in relation to a whole-category approach?

I ask the Minister to not go back into the legal cases. The clear example is in relation to Australia where the Australian air force saw that there was an issue, it engaged with the group and the people retained their right to take cases as they saw fit but there was health screening, an accountability mechanism and health supports. There is nothing preventing the Minister from doing that. When will she make a decision as to whether the Government will put in place a process such as there was in Australia – a study of health outcomes, identifying whether there is causation and ensuring support for people who are very sick? Among these people, there have been heart conditions, colorectal cancer and suicides.

Clearly there is a need for things like routine cardiac screening. These are all things that can be done without any reference to the court cases. When will the Minister make a decision on a solution for the whole category?

Helen McEntee (Meath East, Fine Gael)

The Deputy referenced Australia. The case in Australia involved de-seal and reseal programmes. The maintenance workers were quite literally required to physically climb into fuel tanks of F111 fighter jets. They worked in extremely cramped conditions for extended periods with chronic confined exposure to concentrated hazardous substances. Nobody has suggested at any point that this is in any way aligned with the conditions in the Air Corps.

Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire (Cork South-Central, Sinn Féin)

No, but it still goes on.

Helen McEntee (Meath East, Fine Gael)

We have said very clearly that there need to be better health and safety standards. That is something that has been made very clear and those changes have been made. As the Deputy has outlined, we have a significant number of different conditions that have come to the fore with the litigants who have been mentioned. However, it has not yet been identified whether this was specific to the exposure.

Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire (Cork South-Central, Sinn Féin)

Helen McEntee (Meath East, Fine Gael)

*****

A comparison of both scandals by
Google Gemini AI

Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Deseal/Reseal scandal and the Irish Air Corps toxic chemical exposure scandal share similarities in that both involve maintenance personnel suffering catastrophic health consequences from chemical exposure. However, a comparison of the conditions and the respective state responses reveals stark contrasts.

Dangers of Chemicals Used

• • • RAAF: Australian personnel suffered prolonged and repeated exposure to volatile organic compounds and solvents used to repair fuel leaks inside the cramped fuel tanks of F-111 fighter bombers between 1974 and 2000,.
    • Irish Air Corps: Irish personnel were exposed to a highly toxic cocktail of known carcinogens, mutagens, and teratogens, including Trichloroethylene (TCE), Dichloromethane (DCM), and Ardrox 666, which contained hexavalent chromium and cresylic acid. Internal advocates and whistle-blowers have noted that the chemicals used in Ireland were substantially more toxic than those in the Australian scandal.

PPE and Training (or Lack Thereof)

• • • RAAF: Australian personnel were exposed without appropriate protective equipment, relying on PPE that ultimately failed to protect them from the volatile organics,.
    • Irish Air Corps: There was a complete absence of personal protective equipment (PPE) and absolutely zero training on how to handle these hazardous chemicals,. Personnel were forced to work bare-handed or with “communal gloves” full of holes, and highly toxic chemicals like TCE were used casually to wash grease directly off hands.

Medical and Political Response

• • • RAAF: The Australian political and medical response was swift. In 2000, within weeks of authorities being alerted to the problem, an investigation commenced. By 2001, the Australian government had introduced a comprehensive Health Care Scheme that proactively provided medical care and cancer screening to look after exposed personnel,.
    • Irish Air Corps: The Irish political and medical response has been characterised by advocates as a strategy of “Delay, Deny, Die”. Rather than offering immediate, proactive medical screening, the State has forced dying personnel into grueling, decade-long court battles, aggressively fighting claims “tooth and nail” and denying any responsibility.

Minister McEntee’s May 7th Response and Victim Blaming

During priority questions in Dáil Éireann yesterday (May 7, 2026), Minister for Defence Helen McEntee explicitly rejected the comparison to Australia, downplaying the Irish scandal by arguing that the RAAF personnel worked in “extremely cramped conditions” inside F-111 fuel tanks, which she claimed does not align with the conditions in the Air Corps. She also refused to commit to an Australian-style health outcome study, instead citing internal reports and “ongoing litigation” as reasons she is “limited in terms of what I can say”,.

Crucially, Minister McEntee used the Dáil to explicitly deny accusations that the State is “prolonging legal proceedings as a deliberate tactic”. Instead, she announced that the State Claims Agency had recently offered “mediation to find a resolution,” but claimed that “those approaches have been rejected pending the cases having been set down for hearing”. She then publicly encouraged the victims to “take up that offer,” framing the State as eager to find a “mutually agreeable resolution”.

When viewed against the backdrop of the State’s actions, this appears to be a calculated attempt to shift the blame for the delays onto the victims to make them appear unreasonable. The State and the State Claims Agency have spent over a decade fighting these cases, previously forcing whistle-blowers to battle all the way to the Supreme Court, a process that took eight years—just to force the military to hand over the basic safety data sheets for the chemicals they used,.

After orchestrating these exhaustive, decade-long delays that have drained the victims physically and financially, the Minister is now weaponizing the victims’ desire to finally have their hard-fought cases heard in court. By framing their rejection of last-minute mediation as a roadblock, the State is attempting to wash its hands of the delay and paint the dying personnel as uncooperative, rather than victims seeking the justice and accountability they have been denied for over ten years.

*****

It should be noted that the Minister actively refuses to hear the other side of the story. Minister McEntee is only engaging with the perpetrators and the State Claims Agency whose personnel have profited from this scandal through performance relate gratuities. Minister McEntee has refused to talk to victims as have her immediate predecessors.

*****

Delay – Deny – Die